Montag, 13. Februar 2017

at Base India Residency

This February and March I am staying at the Base India Residency devoted to art, philosophy and ecology. We are studying Deleuze, Nietzsche, Freud and the Yoga Sutras, research on collective creation of a field from with philosophy emerges naturally and have a lot of time for our individual work. Love from there.


by the way: here is a little guest DJ appearance of myself in Iris Julian's Video of her performance the in/visible club culture project at Explosophy #2.

the in/visible club culture project @ philosophy unbound from iris julian on Vimeo.




Samstag, 7. Januar 2017

Explosophy #2 - 2 Years Philosophy Unbound



Philosophy Unbound is excited to celebrate its second anniversary with its friends, supporters and adversaries. For this special occasion we are proud to announce the performances of Anna de Marco, Max Oravin and Iris Julian. These will be followed by our our very own Fernando Johansson Will and Kilian Jörg back to back in an open end DJ-Set.

14th of January 2017, 22h-7h
Venster99, Gürtelbogen 99, 1090 Wien

22:30  Oravin
Die Grenzbereiche zwischen Noise und elektronischer Tanzmusik, Singen und Sprechen, Sprache und Sprachlosigkeit erkundend, steht Oravin sowohl in der Tradition des deutschen New Wave als auch der österreichischen experimentellen Dichtung.

23:30  Anna de Marco


00:30 KLN b2b Fernando Johansson [Philosophy Unbound Berlin/Vienna]
https://soundcloud.com/klnkln
https://www.mixcloud.com/fernandojohansson/

22:00 - 04:00 “the in/visible club culture project”
Every hour there will be a performative intervention by
Iris Julian.

Doors 22:00

Entry: Free Donation - Suggestion 5€ (we are a No-Budget Organisation: everything will go to the performers)

Philosophy Unbound is a Vienna and Berlin based collective dedicated to open up new forms of and spaces for philosophy. For more information see: philosophyunbound.tumblr.com
Facebook-Event

Montag, 5. Dezember 2016

MASCULINITIES - Philosophy Unbound #14 on 8th of December 2016 in Vienna


I am very glad to announce that Philosophy Unbound is dedicating its next evening to a topic that is particular important to me. In the last year I have been extensively delving into a research-field that can be summoned under the name 'masculinity studies'. I was quite surprised by how much important work there has already been done in this field and how dis-proportionally unknown their authors, discourses and acquired knowledge were even to me, an academically trained philosopher who identifies as a feminist. This of course reflects the status of this discourse in a larger, "intellectual mainstream media" habitat: whereas female roles, mechanisms of subjection, oppression and suppression are quite (though not necessarily enough) often a subject of debate, male roles, how they are established, enforced and dualistically constructed are much less a subject of public debate. This is sad, because it reflects a typical dynamic of a scheme of oppression: oppressed groups tend to be intellectually much more reflected than their oppressors.
If our goal is to work towards ending hegemonic masculinity (in the sense of Raewyn Connell) a reflection on the constitution of masculinities is necessary. In a time of a certain neo-patriarchal backlash we need to understand how the success of a Trump, an Erdogan and - luckily not to the same extent, because he was defeated yesterday - Hofer (47% are still way too much) but as well how phenomena like Daesh or Breivik are related to masculinity - and how these two seemingly distinct phenomena correlate into a reinforcement of patriarchal structures: there is talk about a 'crisis of men' these days, but it seems, that those mechanisms of crisis are an essential part of a machine that is securing and re-actualizing male hegemony. To progress in the project of feminism (perhaps the most important discursive streams of the last centuries) we need to integrate male roles into our reflections. I whole-heartedly invite you to come to Spektakel and Celeste this Thursday and contribute in small parts to this important project - let us reflect and discuss masculinities and their dynamics. 

Philosophy Unbound #14 will explore MASCULINITIES
In the name of Feminism, we call for a deconstruction of “the man“ and for male roles to be questioned and pluralized. What makes “a man”? To man-up or rather to learn how to cry? Why is the call for a “strong man” still appealing ? How do this topic’s lines of flight relate to conservative backlashes of sex-/gender- roles? 



Performances @ Spektakel Hamburgerstrasse 14, 1050 Wien


Kakaonter Strajk
Rainer Mühlhoff
Egyröl Kettöre
Christoph Stuhlpfarrer u. fabiomaria.com
$andro + £aura
Thordis Wolf
Iris Julian


Open Stage! 

Literature by Vanguardist (200 free editions to hand out!!), Wespennest and éngagée-Magazines

Doors: 19h
Start: 20h

Entry: Free Donation - Suggestion 5€ 
(We are a No-Budget Organisation: Everything will go to the performers.)


Afterparty @ Celeste Hamburgerstrasse 18, 1050 Wien
Jay Smoo (Glow/Service)
DJ Al-Serori Rodriguez (Pferde from outta space)

Start: 22h
Entry: Free Donation


for more information see philosophyunbound.tumblr.com




Dienstag, 22. November 2016

Philosophy Unbound #13 "Back to the Future > Europe" on 30th of November 2016 at Flutgraben Berlin

November 30th @ Flutgraben Berlin
Am Flutgraben 3, 12435 Berlin
Doors 7:30 pm  // Start 20 pm

This time we will spotlight a continent in motion: Europe.
In an attempt to move beyond conservative fantasies and eurocentric reflexes, we inquire after the utopian histories, possible futures and instable actualities of this contested territory.
Let’s reach out far - and come back soon: Back to the future.

PERFORMANCES BY
Sara Zaltash (artist, Bristol)
Saud Al-Zaid (researcher, Berlin)
Ricardo Domeneck (poet, Berlin)
Brigitte Wilfing (performer, Vienna)
PhiloMeta (mc’s, Hamburg)

DJs
Jana Falcon
Fernando Johansson
Kilian Jörg

Facebook event
more info

Mittwoch, 9. November 2016

Post-Trump: How could the left stop being reactionary?

Trump, Erdoğan, Orban, Brexit, Putin, Hofer, Le Pen, Wilders - the rise of neo-authoritarian demagogues with their inclination towards patriarchy, fascism and racial supremacy is frightening. In this geopolitical predicament most of the political Left seems forced to be reactionary in its most literal sense: they can only react to this unforeseen leap to right wing values and ideas most on the left have considered passé. What used to be the key electorate of the left is now putting more and more fascists and semi-fascists into office, while the left assembles a weird heterogeneous field that extends from the more "reasonable" leftist activists to neoliberal capitalists opting for extended free trade. While this new union is quite revealing about the "New Left" (as Clinton, Blair and Schröder have put it forth in the 90ies) and its vast contradictions, I do not want to explore this further in this post - Adam Curtis' The Century of the Self (especially Part 4) does a good job in presenting its genealogy. Much rather, I would like to analyze a particular stance in Adam Curtis' new documentary Hypernormalisation, which is paradigmatic for the critical left and its predicament. 
In Hypernormalisation, Adam Curtis portrays quite brilliantly how US-politics have become detached from reality and instead worked in the logic of the spectacle: while the real late- and post-soviet geo-political landscape became ever more complex, "those in power" (a wording Curtis might use a little too much) produced Hollywood-inspired images of great villains threatening the free world to gain votes, while the people were increasingly depoliticised and caught in their bubbles of self-emancipation and individualism. "Those in power" manipulated all of us to such an extent, that what used to be mere simulations and figments were now defining the real world and its politics, warfares and material organizations - we can not discern between manipulation and reality any longer is Curtis' credo, which he links to Trumps success in the final sequences of his documentary. 
This epistemological stance of "the truth that disappeared behind spectacle" is methodologically incorporated in his own film making: although he scorns the manipulative ways of "those in power", he doesn't have any scruples himself to manipulate the viewer by any means necessary - he uses images of Hollywood-blockbusters and their incorporated sense of looming catastrophe; he accompanies his images with tragic, dark music that set the tone for his message; and even the images used in the film frequently lack any correlation with the story that is told (for example, while his voice in the off is telling of the fall of Soviet Russia and the Kremlin in 1991, he is showing images of Elena Ceaușescu's execution in Romania of 1989).
Adam Curtis uses all the manipulative ways available to make the viewer believe his analysis of how capitalist power rearranged itself after 1968. He is using the "weapon of the enemy": he is manipulating us to see the manipulators. If everything is manipulation, the Left needs to manipulate as well - so his key motivation. 
The problem behind this stance is not, that it uses manipulation. The problem is, that it uses manipulation while at the same time scolding it. This results in an all-too-easy critical position that is very typical for contemporary leftist intelligentsia: they are very well capable to understand "post-truth" politics, but they don't add anything productive to it, which might change its ways. If there is nothing but manipulation, why always scold "those in power" for using it? It is a little too comfortable to use this double-standard-game, blaming those who use manipulation while at the same time affirming that there is no alternative to manipulation. Furthermore, we see again that this semi-conspiratory narration is effectively used by Right wing politics: Trump's - as well as Hofer's, Le Pen's or Orban's - campaign is almost monothematically based on resentment against "those in power".
Other than reproducing the same stories of the evil manipulators that might unwillingly be counterproductive for any progressive politics, we should ask ourselves how we can manipulate better than "those in power". "What would critique do if it could be associated with more, not with less, with multiplication, not subtraction". If we continue to create critical stories of the evil manipulation, we unknowingly cater to conservatives and their christian-platonist values and metaphysics of a truth that might appear behind semblance. Everything is manipulation. Let's affirm it and add a better manipulation than the hegemonic one. This is much harder work - but it will be the only way to stop the Left from being reactionary.



 

Dienstag, 8. November 2016

Gastauftritt der Clubmaschine @ Kulturwelle Radio



Im Rahmen der Sendung "Tanz mit der Neurose - Lacan und Marx im Club" der Kulturwelle im Gespräch mit Samo Tomšič wurde ein kleiner Beitrag aus unserer Septemberlesung im Kalligramm dazugemixt.

Nachzuhören hier, ab Minute 40.

Zur Beschreibung der Sendung:
In der dritten Ausgabe der Kulturwelle Afterhour haben wir den Philosophen und Lacanianer Samo Tomšič zu Gast. Mit seiner Hilfe forschen wir dem Verhältnis von Arbeit und Feiern aus psychoanalytischer Perspektive nach. Dazu nehmen wir die Diagnose von Karl Marx und den Tiefenblick Jacques Lacans mit in den Technoclub. Wie viel Politik, wie viel Produktivität und wie viel Subversion lassen sich hier eigentlich aufspüren – zwischen der alltäglichen Genussoptimierung und der maschinengestützten Tanzekstase?

Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016

Philosophy Unbound #12 - Utopia / Dystopia - 13.10.2016, 20h

This Thursday Philosophy Unbound will have its 12th edition!



“Things were somehow so good that they were in danger of becoming very bad because what is fully mature is very close to rotting”
― Clarice Lispector, A Hora Da Estrela

The 12th edition of Philosophy Unbound will present performances that deal with utopia, dystopia and all the places in between.

Performances (Most of them will be in German):
> Rita Braga - Interpretation of our Manifesto

> Vieider/Kraner – Fläche

> Franek Zbieszczyk - Endogenous or exogenous DMT as the only means to save the world by revealing an Apocalypse

> Anna-Sophie Fritz & Nikolaij Janocha - Z-Talk

> Johannes Siegmund - Die Monster des Designkapitalismus

> Frederike Schuh & Paul Seiler - Heterotopien for the win

> Open Stage!

Doors: 7pm
Start: 8pm

Entry: Free donation (We are a no-budget-organization. Everything will go to the performers.)

AFTER PARTY: Celeste Wien

DJs:
lena:k [Maschineraum] & Adorno [Entkunstung // Laissez-Faire]

more info & the full program can be found on the blog and on facebook.